RanchiMall/electrumx
3
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

A couple more tweaks.

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Neil Booth 2016-11-06 14:56:08 +09:00
parent 6deb05ab6f
commit f02acdfd46
2 changed files with 6 additions and 3 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

3
PERFORMANCE-NOTES
View File

@ -5,6 +5,9 @@ account in the code.
or lists with tuple(), list(). Of those list is 10% faster than or lists with tuple(), list(). Of those list is 10% faster than
tuple. tuple.
- however when not initializing from a generator, a fixed-length tuple
is at least 80% faster than a list.
- an implicit default argument is ~5% faster than passing the default - an implicit default argument is ~5% faster than passing the default
explicitly explicitly

6
server/block_processor.py
View File

@ -211,8 +211,8 @@ class MemPool(LoggedClass):
return (script_hash168(txout.pk_script), txout.value) return (script_hash168(txout.pk_script), txout.value)
for hex_hash, tx in new_txs.items(): for hex_hash, tx in new_txs.items():
txout_pairs = tuple(txout_pair(txout) for txout in tx.outputs) txout_pairs = [txout_pair(txout) for txout in tx.outputs]
self.txs[hex_hash] = [None, txout_pairs, None] self.txs[hex_hash] = (None, txout_pairs, None)
def txin_info(txin): def txin_info(txin):
hex_hash = hash_to_str(txin.prev_hash) hex_hash = hash_to_str(txin.prev_hash)
@ -239,7 +239,7 @@ class MemPool(LoggedClass):
# If we were missing a UTXO for some reason drop this tx # If we were missing a UTXO for some reason drop this tx
del self.txs[hex_hash] del self.txs[hex_hash]
continue continue
self.txs[hex_hash] = [txin_pairs, txout_pairs, any(unconfs)] self.txs[hex_hash] = (txin_pairs, txout_pairs, any(unconfs))
# Update touched and self.hash168s for the new tx # Update touched and self.hash168s for the new tx
for hash168, value in txin_pairs: for hash168, value in txin_pairs: