RanchiMall/electrumx
3
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Practise optimism like before

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Neil Booth 2016-11-10 21:22:58 +09:00
parent 311f7f9ffd
commit f98dc9c351
2 changed files with 24 additions and 12 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

28
server/block_processor.py
View File

@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ class MemPool(LoggedClass):
try:
infos = (txin_info(txin) for txin in tx.inputs)
txin_pairs, unconfs = zip(*infos)
except MissingUTXOError:
except self.bp.MissingUTXOError:
# Drop this TX. If other mempool txs depend on it
# it's harmless - next time the mempool is refreshed
# they'll either be cleaned up or the UTXOs will no
@ -949,6 +949,19 @@ class BlockProcessor(server.db.DB):
# Probably a strange UTXO
return NO_CACHE_ENTRY
# FIXME: this matches what we did previously but until we store
# all UTXOs isn't safe
if len(db_value) == 25:
udb_key = b'u' + db_value + idx_packed
utxo_value_packed = self.db.get(udb_key)
if utxo_value_packed:
# Remove the UTXO from both tables
self.db_deletes += 1
self.db_cache[db_key] = None
self.db_cache[udb_key] = None
return db_value + utxo_value_packed
# Fall through to below
assert len(db_value) % 25 == 0
# Find which entry, if any, the TX_HASH matches.
@ -956,15 +969,14 @@ class BlockProcessor(server.db.DB):
tx_num, = unpack('<I', db_value[n+21:n+25])
hash, height = self.get_tx_hash(tx_num)
if hash == tx_hash:
self.db_deletes += 1
match = db_value[n:n+25]
# Remove the UTXO from both tables
self.db_cache[db_key] = db_value[:n] + db_value[n + 25:]
db_key = b'u' + match + idx_packed
utxo_value_packed = self.db.get(db_key)
udb_key = b'u' + match + idx_packed
utxo_value_packed = self.db.get(udb_key)
if utxo_value_packed:
self.db_cache[db_key] = None
# Remove the UTXO from both tables
self.db_deletes += 1
self.db_cache[db_key] = db_value[:n] + db_value[n + 25:]
self.db_cache[udb_key] = None
return match + utxo_value_packed
# Uh-oh, this should not happen...

8
server/db.py
View File

@ -210,12 +210,12 @@ class DB(LoggedClass):
assert len(db_value) % 25 == 0
# Find which entry, if any, the TX_HASH matches.
for n in range(0, len(data), 25):
tx_num_packed = data[n + 21: n + 25]
for n in range(0, len(db_value), 25):
tx_num_packed = db_value[n + 21: n + 25]
tx_num, = unpack('<I', tx_num_packed)
hash, height = self.fs_tx_hash(tx_num)
if hash == tx_hash:
return data[n:n+21], tx_num_packed
return db_value[n:n+21], tx_num_packed
return None, None
@ -230,7 +230,7 @@ class DB(LoggedClass):
if not hash168:
# This can happen when the daemon is a block ahead of us
# and has mempool txs spending new txs in that block
raise MissingUTXOError
raise self.MissingUTXOError
key = b'u' + hash168 + tx_num_packed + idx_packed
db_value = self.db.get(key)