RanchiMall/node-open-mining-portal
3
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

remove paytxfee functionality - it doesnt really help

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Eugene@ubuntu 2014-03-27 17:28:42 +04:00
parent b5c9d0174b
commit d744dc2857
1 changed files with 16 additions and 29 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

45
libs/paymentProcessor.js
View File

@ -429,38 +429,25 @@ function SetupForPool(logger, poolOptions){
// We have to pay some tx fee here too but maybe we shoudn't really care about it too much as long as fee is less // We have to pay some tx fee here too but maybe we shoudn't really care about it too much as long as fee is less
// then minimumReserve value. Because in this case even if feeCollectAccount account will have negative balance // then minimumReserve value. Because in this case even if feeCollectAccount account will have negative balance
// total wallet balance will be positive and feeCollectAccount account will be refilled during next payment processing. // total wallet balance will be positive and feeCollectAccount account will be refilled during next payment processing.
// But to be as much accurate as we can we use getinfo command to retrieve minimum tx fee (paytxfee). var withdrawalAmount = results[0].response;
daemon.cmd('getinfo', [], function(result){
var paytxfee; if (withdrawalAmount < processingConfig.feeWithdrawalThreshold){
if (!result[0].response || !result[0].response.paytxfee){ logger.debug(logSystem, logComponent, 'Not enough profit to withdraw yet');
logger.error(logSystem, logComponent, 'Daemon does not have paytxfee property on getinfo method results - withdrawal processing could be broken with this daemon'); }
paytxfee = 0; else{
} else {
paytxfee = result[0].response.paytxfee;
}
var withdrawalAmount = results[0].response - paytxfee; var withdrawal = {};
withdrawal[processingConfig.feeReceiveAddress] = withdrawalAmount;
if (withdrawalAmount < processingConfig.feeWithdrawalThreshold){
logger.debug(logSystem, logComponent, 'Not enough profit to withdraw yet');
}
else{
var withdrawal = {};
withdrawal[processingConfig.feeReceiveAddress] = withdrawalAmount;
daemon.cmd('sendmany', [processingConfig.feeCollectAccount, withdrawal], function(results){
if (results[0].error){
logger.debug(logSystem, logComponent, 'Profit withdrawal finished - error with sendmany ' + JSON.stringify(results[0].error));
return;
}
logger.debug(logSystem, logComponent, 'Profit sent, a total of ' + withdrawalAmount + ' ' + poolOptions.coin.symbol +
' was sent to ' + processingConfig.feeReceiveAddress);
});
}
});
daemon.cmd('sendmany', [processingConfig.feeCollectAccount, withdrawal], function(results){
if (results[0].error){
logger.debug(logSystem, logComponent, 'Profit withdrawal finished - error with sendmany ' + JSON.stringify(results[0].error));
return;
}
logger.debug(logSystem, logComponent, 'Profit sent, a total of ' + withdrawalAmount + ' ' + poolOptions.coin.symbol +
' was sent to ' + processingConfig.feeReceiveAddress);
});
}
}); });
}; };